DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS LLC RADIOLUCENT-DRIVE; INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, ORTHOPEDIC, AC-POWERED, MOTOR/ACCESS AND ATTACHMENT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 511.300 |
Device Problems
Overheating of Device (1437); Device Inoperable (1663); Noise, Audible (3273)
|
Patient Problems
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); Not Applicable (3189)
|
Event Date 12/25/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reporter's complete address and phone number were not provided.The serial number was unknown; therefore, the date of manufacture was unknown.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that during an unspecified surgical procedure for a humerus diaphysis fracture, it was observed that the radiolucent drive stopped working completely and made an abnormal noise at the time of drilling at the second proximal hole of an expert humeral nail long which retrograded after being inserted.According to the reporter, the surgeon removed a screw and then tested if the device would spin without being loaded but it did not work.It was further reported that the surgeon gave up using the device as the joint part of the device heated up.It was further reported that as the cortex at the near end was already penetrated, the surgeon carefully drilled the cortex at the far end by hand while using a drill tip.As a result, the surgery was delayed for five minutes.It was unknown if a spare device was available for use.There was patient involvement.There were no injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The initial report stated that the date of manufacture was unknown because the serial number was unavailable, the date of manufacture was not unknown, it was reported as may 04, 2015.The serial number was reported as unknown in the initial report.The serial number has been updated to (b)(4).The udi has been updated accordingly.The actual device was returned for evaluation.Reliability engineering evaluated the device and identified no failure.Therefore, the reported condition was not confirmed and assignable root cause was not determined.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|