• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GENZYME BIOSURGERY (RIDGEFIELD) SYNVISC ONE; INTRA-ARTICULAR HYALURONIC ACID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GENZYME BIOSURGERY (RIDGEFIELD) SYNVISC ONE; INTRA-ARTICULAR HYALURONIC ACID Back to Search Results
Lot Number 7RSL021
Device Problem Device Contamination With Biological Material (2908)
Patient Problems Headache (1880); Pain (1994)
Event Date 12/01/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
This spontaneous case from united states was received on 02-jan-2018 from the patient this case concerns a (b)(6) female patient who initiated treatment with synvisc one and after an unknown latency experienced headaches, neck pain, light headedness, little puffiness after injection and little soreness after injection, also, device malfunction was identified for the reported lot number.No medical history, previous medications, concomitant medications and concurrent conditions were reported.On (b)(6) 2017, patient received treatment with intra articular synvisc one injection (dose, frequency and indication: not provided).On an unknown date in (b)(6) 2017, after an unknown latency, there was always a little puffiness and soreness after the injection.She also saw some headaches and neck pain.She has also noticed light headedness at different times, usually an overnight thing where she did not have balance and that had happened several times since the injection (onset: (b)(6) 2017; latency: unknown).Corrective treatment: not reported for all events.Outcome: not recovered for all events.Seriousness criteria: important medical event for device malfunction an investigation was initiated as a result of an unexpected increase in the number of labelled adverse events received from the us market for synvisc one, lot 7rsl021.The product met all release testing at time of manufacture in june 2017.Retain samples were retested due to the unexpected increase in adverse events.Higher than expected endotoxin results were obtained.In addition, the presence of microbial contamination was also confirmed.The cause of these events is under investigation.Once this investigation is completed, corrective and preventive actions will be implemented pharmacovigilance comment: sanofi company comment dated 09-jan-2017: this case concerns a female patient who received synvisc one injection from the recalled lot in her right knee and had little puffiness and soreness after the injection, light headedness, neck pain and headaches.A temporal relationship can be established with the product administration.Furthermore, the concerned lot number has been identified to have malfunction by the company.Therefore, the causal relationship of the events to the products cannot be excluded.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNVISC ONE
Type of Device
INTRA-ARTICULAR HYALURONIC ACID
Manufacturer (Section D)
GENZYME BIOSURGERY (RIDGEFIELD)
1125 pleadantview terrace
ridgefield NJ 07657
Manufacturer Contact
heather schiappacasse
55 corporate drive
55b-220a
bridgewater, NJ 08807
9089817289
MDR Report Key7214724
MDR Text Key98429464
Report Number2246315-2018-00101
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MOZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P940015
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Patient
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/02/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/24/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Lot Number7RSL021
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/02/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age71 YR
-
-