|
Per user facility voluntary medwatch (b)(4): "cardiologist was called in during the middle of the night to place a temporary pacer for patient who was experiencing symptomatic bradycardia.Needle inserted into right internal jugular vein with draw back of blood; went to advance the wire; wire would not advance; went to remove the wire and there was resistance when trying to remove the wire; removed wire and needle; wire was unraveled; gained access again with micropuncture needle; new wire advanced; while advancing the temporary catheter, noticed something on the x-ray but unsure if it was something new or something from a past procedure; after catheter was placed and the questionable object looked at.Procedure finished with new wire.Doctor believes the radiopaque, 'soft cloth part' broke off from the original wire.Fluoro was obtained and the fragment was determined to be embedded in the dermal layer of the skin.Doctor consulted with other physicians who agreed it was not in the vasculature.Removed the fragment under later that day.The fragment was sent to pathology and is 1.2cm in length by.01cm in diameter.No injury to patient." additional information regarding event details, patient anatomy and outcome was requested, but is not available as designated per the customer via email on (b)(6) 2018.
|
|
Investigation - evaluation: a review of the complaint history, drawings, device history record, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, specifications, trends, quality control, and visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.None of the components of the complaint device set were returned for evaluation.A document-based investigation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the finished product was not made to specifications.The device history record was reviewed as well as the internal component device history records and non-conformances were noted; however, all non-conforming product was scrapped prior to completion of the final lot.In addition, there were no other complaints associated with this lot number.The user reported attempting to withdraw the wire through the needle prior to removing the needle, and this is known to damage coiled wires.The caution label for the device depicts a warning to not withdraw the distal spring coil tip wire guide through the needle.Based on the information provided, and the results of our investigation, the root cause has been attributed to user technique.Per the risk assessment, no further action is required.Appropriate personnel have been notified and monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.
|