| Model Number |
CRANI-A-R |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Overheating of Device (1437)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(6).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that the craniotome device was heating up during use.It was not reported if the device was used in surgery, or if there was patient involvement.It was not reported if there were any delays in the surgical procedure, or if a spare device was available for use.It was not reported if there were any injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The exact date of the event was unknown.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device availability was inadvertently documented as (b)(4) 2018 in the medwatch initial report.The date returned to manufacturer was corrected to (b)(4) 2018.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.Device history record review: a device history review was performed, and no non-conformances were detected related to the reported condition.Device evaluation: the actual device was returned for evaluation.Reliability engineering evaluated the device and the reported condition was not confirmed.Therefore, an assignable root cause was not determined.However, a visual and functional assessment was performed which found that the device failed the cutter insertion test due to worn out bearings and the neuro-tip foot had been drilled into and the color ring was faded.An assessment was performed which found that the bearings were worn out, creating a situation whereby the cutter was not able to be inserted.That was because the bearings were no longer in axial alignment not allowing the cutter device to pass through.It was determined that the failure was caused by worn out bearings (normal wear).It was further determined that the color ring was faded due to normal wear over time.It was determined that the cause of the craniotome foot drilled was due to failure to follow the directions for use.When the burr was improperly loaded into the attachment device and then installed onto the drill device, the burr did not seat properly in the locking chamber.The attachment device was forced into position which placed the distal tip of the burr in compression.At that point, the tip of the burr was in direct contact with the neuro tip of the attachment.When the drill was started, the burr drilled into or through the neuro tip.The assignable root causes were determined to be due to user error (drilled neuro-tip foot) and by normal wear out from use (cannot insert cutter, and the faded color ring).If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|