| Model Number |
351.782 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
There was no known reported patient involvement associated with the complained event.Unknown when device malfunctioned.Supplier lot # reported as: 5016631.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(4).The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that when the sales consultant picked up a field inventory reamer set on (b)(6) 2018, the holding forceps were found broken.It is not known how the forceps broke.The forceps were not used in surgery.There was no patient involvement.This report is for one (1) holding forceps.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A device history record (dhr) review was performed for part no.: 351.782, lot no.: 5016631:manufacturing location: (b)(4), release to warehouse date: 30.Oct.2007: no non-conformance reports (ncrs) were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.A product investigation was performed.The returned device was confirmed to be broken.The handle is broken through the hole where the set screw connects to the handle.Replication of the complaint is not applicable as the device is already broken.The device shows normal wear consistent with use.No additional malfunctions were observed during investigation.Relevant drawings were reviewed during investigation.Based on review of the dhr records there is no indication that any issues with material or material properties contributed to the complaint condition.The width of the handle adjacent to the breakage was measured and found to be within the specification per relevant drawing.It is likely that the device was subjected to excessive forces during the 10+ year life of the device.There were no issues during the manufacture of this product that would contribute to this complaint condition.During the investigation, no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|