|
The device was not returned for an analysis and no imaging was provided.Without the complaint device, a physical investigation was not able to be completed.A document based investigation has been performed which includes a review of complaint history, the device history record, the instructions for use, and quality control data.The device history record was reviewed and no related non-conformances were identified.Each device is shipped with the instructions for use (ifu) that lists the anatomical requirements, warning & precautions, and the correct deployment procedure.The ifu also advises on appropriate patient follow up so that changes in the structure, should they occur, can be identified and addressed before causing clinical problems.Per the ifu, pre-existing regions of stenosis/narrowing (less than approximately 20mm id in the aorta or 7 to 8 mm id in the iliacs) have been shown to increase the risk of a thromboembolic event (e.G., graft limb occlusion).The potential for this increased risk in these patients may preclude placement of an endovascular graft.Thrombosis can occur for a variety of reasons, such as genetic predisposition, iliac tortuosity, external compression, improper overlap, narrow inner iliac lumen, vessel damage, and rough surfaces.The physician reported that the stenosis was present in the anatomy of the patient.Stenosis of the vasculature would have radially compressed the graft causing the graft lumen to narrow.This may have resulted in loose graft fabric, which would have increased the thrombogenicity of the graft material.Genetic predisposition may have also contributed to thrombus formation and cannot be ruled out.There is no information to suggest that vessel damage or iliac tortuosity contributed to this event but cannot ruled out.Improper overlap or rough surfaces both would increase thrombogenicity of the graft but were not mentioned in this case.It is possible that the stenosis in the patient's anatomy led to the formation of the thrombus but without information to rule out other possible causes, a definitve cause cannot be established.Measures have been initiated to address this failure mode.The appropriate cook personnel have been notified of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.H3 other text : blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.The device was not returned for an analysis and no imaging was provided.Without the complaint device, a physical investigation was not able to be completed.A document based investigation has been performed which includes a review of complaint history, the device history record, the instructions for use, and quality control data.The device history record was reviewed and no related non-conformances were identified.Each device is shipped with the instructions for use (ifu) that lists the anatomical requirements, warning & precautions, and the correct deployment procedure.The ifu also advises on appropriate patient follow up so that changes in the structure, should they occur, can be identified and addressed before causing clinical problems.Per the ifu, pre-existing regions of stenosis/narrowing (less than approximately 20mm id in the aorta or 7 to 8 mm id in the iliacs) have been shown to increase the risk of a thromboembolic event (e.G., graft limb occlusion).The potential for this increased risk in these patients may preclude placement of an endovascular graft.Thrombosis can occur for a variety of reasons, such as genetic predisposition, iliac tortuosity, external compression, improper overlap, narrow inner iliac lumen, vessel damage, and rough surfaces.The physician reported that the stenosis was present in the anatomy of the patient.Stenosis of the vasculature would have radially compressed the graft causing the graft lumen to narrow.This may have resulted in loose graft fabric, which would have increased the thrombogenicity of the graft material.Genetic predisposition may have also contributed to thrombus formation and cannot be ruled out.There is no information to suggest that vessel damage or iliac tortuosity contributed to this event but cannot ruled out.Improper overlap or rough surfaces both would increase thrombogenicity of the graft but were not mentioned in this case.It is possible that the stenosis in the patient's anatomy led to the formation of the thrombus but without information to rule out other possible causes, a definitve cause cannot be established.Measures have been initiated to address this failure mode.The appropriate cook personnel have been notified of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|