Catalog Number 1500225-38 |
Device Problems
Difficult To Position (1467); Difficult to Remove (1528); Unstable (1667); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 01/10/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The xience sierra is currently not commercially available in the u.S.; however, it is similar to a device sold in the u.S.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a non-tortuous, non-calcified de novo lesion in the proximal right coronary artery that was 70% stenosed.The patient was admitted with chest pain and angioplasty.During the procedure, the physician created side holes with a needle in an unspecified guiding catheter that was to be used.The lesion was then prepped with an unspecified balloon.A 2.25 x 38mm xience sierra stent delivery system (sds) was attempted to be advanced to the lesion but was unable to because resistance was met with the guiding catheter.Reportedly, the physician thought the resistance was caused by creating side holes in the guide catheter which created a lip that snagged the stent.Resistance was also met during removal of the device.Once the device was withdrawn, it was noted that the stent had elongated and had started to come off of the balloon.A 2.5 x 38mm xience alpine sds was used to successfully complete the procedure.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure and no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal file number - (b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The reported stretched stent - material deformation was confirmed.The unstable stent was not able to be confirmed due to the stent extensive deformation condition.The difficulty to position and to remove were unable to be replicated in a testing environment as they were based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacture or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|