|
Results: the lantern was ovalized approximately 112.0 cm from the hub.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned devices revealed that the lantern was ovalized and the ruby coil was stuck inside.The ovalization in the lantern typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the device is forcefully gripped or pinched during insertion, damage such as this may occur.Further evaluation of the returned devices revealed that the ruby coil was stuck inside the lantern and detached from its pusher assembly.If the device is advanced through a damaged catheter, resistance may be experienced and the device may get stuck.Subsequently, if the device is forcefully retracted against resistance, the embolization coil may detach from its pusher assembly.The ruby coil being advance through a damage catheter likely contributed the resistance experience and subsequently, retraction against resistance resulted in the unintentional detachment.A stainless steel mandrel was advanced through the lantern.While advancing the stainless steel mandrel through the lantern, resistance was encountered as the mandrel approached the proximal end of the embolization coil that was stuck inside the lantern and the mandrel could not be advanced any further.The ruby coil was detached and stuck inside the lantern and, therefore, could not be functionally tested.The ruby coil's pusher assembly was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra catheters and coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2018-00212.
|
|
The patient was undergoing a medical procedure using a neuron max.During the procedure, the physician was unable to advance the neuron max through the vessel and into the internal iliac artery (iia) because the tip was too soft.The neuron max was therefore removed, and the procedure was completed using a non-penumbra catheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Results: there was no visible damage to the neuron max.The outer diameter (od) of the neuron max and dilator were measured to be within specification.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that there was no visible damage to the neuron max and dilator.The od of the neuron max and dilator were measured to be within specification.The root cause of the reported issue could not be determined.The neuron max could not be functionally tested for the reported issue.Penumbra catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|