|
It was reported that balloon deflation slow occurred.The target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified right coronary artery.A 2.00mm x 8mm apex¿ balloon catheter was advanced for dilation.However, after the third inflation, it took time for the balloon to deflate; the balloon was removed in a deflated state.The procedure was completed with a non-bsc device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
|
|
It was reported that balloon deflation slow occurred.The target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified right coronary artery.A 2.00mm x 8mm apex¿ balloon catheter was advanced for dilation.However, after the third inflation, it took time for the balloon to deflate; the balloon was removed in a deflated state.The procedure was completed with a non-bsc device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
|
|
Device evaluated by mfr., eval summary attached, method codes, result codes, conclusion codes updated. device evaluated by mfr: returned product consisted of an apex balloon catheter.The balloon was loosely folded with dried contrast in the balloon and inflation lumen.The device was soaked in a warm waterbath for three weeks, with the dried contrast rehydrated and became cloudy.The balloon, markerbands, proximal bond, inner/outer shaft, and tip were microscopically, tactile and visually inspected.Inspection (after soaking) revealed the contrast was visually cloudy and filled the balloon and a portion of the inflation lumen.Microscopic examination of the device presented no irregularities in the balloon material, markerband, proximal bond or inner/outer shaft.After soaking, functional testing was conducted by attaching an inflation device to the hub of the balloon catheter and inflating to rated burst pressure, and negative pressure was applied.Despite applying negative pressure, the balloon did not deflate and fluid did not/could not flow through the inflation lumen (outer shaft).Functional testing was performed several times, with the same results each time.The complaint device was put into an x-ray machine, in order to capture images of the contrast inside of the device.X-ray imaging showed extensive contrast throughout the device.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The excessive amount of contrast in the device is consistent with deflation difficulties.The investigation conclusion is caused by other device as another device/drug/subsequent procedure caused the complaint event. (b)(4).
|