• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC, INC INTRAKIT; INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC, INC INTRAKIT; INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Device Problem Component or Accessory Incompatibility (2897)
Patient Problem Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 11/01/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The physician used a launcher guide catheter and an intrakit transradial access kit during a procedure.There was no damage noted to the launcher packaging.The launcher device was not inspected.The diagnostic angiogram was performed without problems.The intrakit transradial sheath was put in without effort.The patient then needed an intervention.An attempt to advance the 6f launcher catheter through the intra kit 6f sheath was made without success.A lot of resistance was felt.The catheter went through the hub, but the catheter could not get past the tip of the sheath.The physician reported that the exit point of the sheath was not 6f to accommodate the 6f catheter.A sheath exchange was not done because the physician was scared that the patient could get radial artery spasm.The physician¿s concern over sheath exchange and radial artery spasm was not related to the intrakit sheath.The physician was concerned about radial spasm in general, not because it was an intrakit.A femoral approach was used to finish the procedure.The patient was impacted in that there was a puncture site in the patient's arm and groin.The procedure was also longer.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: patient is fine and was fine at the time of the case as well.Correction: updated notified date is (b)(6) 2017.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis summary: the devices exhibited blood stains indicating use or handling in a medical setting.The guide catheter was received with an s shape.Visual inspection of the catheter detected a kink on the shaft.The guide catheter measurements met specifications.The intrakit had no visual damage.The actual sheath od, sheath id at the tip and at the hub met specifications.During recreational testing an in-house 6f guide catheter was passed through the lumen of the returned introducer sheath resulting in some resistance but regardless of the noted resistance, the catheter advanced and exited the tip of the sheath.The outer diameter of the in-house sample was 0.0861¿ indicating a higher od compared with the returned guide catheter, the in-house catheter od was below maximum outer diameter.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTRAKIT
Type of Device
INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC, INC
37a cherry hill dr
danvers MA 01923
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC, INC
37a cherry hill dr
danvers MA 01923
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
091708734
MDR Report Key7251339
MDR Text Key99349232
Report Number1220452-2018-00011
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSF
PMA/PMN Number
K162097
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/24/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/11/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/12/2018
Initial Date FDA Received02/08/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/23/2018
03/29/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/22/2018
04/24/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-