| Catalog Number |
8400.22FO1 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
03/20/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The metal particle most likely comes from either the hand piece or the phaco needle.It is also possible that the particles arise for other reasons (for example unintentional cross-threading of the threads on hand piece / needle during fixation and tightening).The phaco needle was used together with a hand-piece (make and manufacturer unknown).A supplemental will be submitted when any new information is received.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A report has been received of an incident that occured in (b)(6).The following was reported :a metal part was flushed into the eye during the surgery.The case has been finished with a short delay for removing the part from the eye.No harm or ill effect has been reported.The hand piece cannot be returned by the hospital and the metal piece concerned was discarded.The phaco needle has been returned is currently undergoing investigation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The metal particle most likely comes from either the hand piece of the phaco needle.It is also possible that the particles arise for other reasons.A supplemental will be submitted with any new information.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device analysis: two phaco needles were returned to dorc.One needle revealed damage to its base due to the wrench that was used to fix it to the hand piece.The tip of the needle appeared to be intact.The second needle revealed no damage or other anomalies.Based on the investigation performed, it can be concluded that the metal part that was flushed into the eye did not originate from any of these needles.Since the reported particles have not been retrieved, in combination with the investigation on the needles, the true origin of the metal part cannot be determined.Review of the complaint database revealed no similar complaints on the lot.Please note that complaints regarding dorc products will continue to be monitored by qa.Conclusion: after careful analysis there is no evidence that the metal particles came from the needle.This conclusion is enhanced by the fact that our phaco needles are subject to an ultrasonic cleaning process after machining which is intended to remove any residues from the machining process.Although this complaint is on the phaco needle, we feel that the hand piece may be the root cause of the issue.Unfortunately the make and manufacturer of the hand piece is not known.It is also possible that the particles arise for some other reasons ( for example unintentional cross threading of the threads on the hand piece/need/needle during fixation and tightening).Our ongoing post market surveillance will continue to carefully monitor our products, and we will review our findings if new information emerges that helps us determine where the metal may have come from.All available information has been disclosed.This complaint has now been closed as not confirmed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No patient harm.The surgery has been finished with a short delay for removing the part from the eye.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Although it has been indicated by the customer that the complaint is on a phaco needle, the product indicated (surgical kit) does not include a phaco needle.Investigation will be started as soon as the metal piece is available in zuidland.A supplemental will be filed with any new updates or information.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|