|
Section d information references the main component of the system.Other relevant device(s) are: (enter (b)(4) number, serial number (b)(4), use by date (b)(6) 2014 and upn# (b)(4)).Film evaluation summary; the exact cause of the bilateral limb migration could not be determined from the films provided.The anatomy at implant is unknown, earlier post-implant films were not available as the patient was lost to follow-ups, and additional images during the intervention were also not provided.Review of a 3d-ct film report from 5+ years post-implant (first patient follow-up since implant) confirmed that the right limb was tortuous and crossed over the left limb, and both limbs appeared to have pulled out of the aneurysmal iliac arteries.A likely distal type i endoleak was seen on the right side.Along the essentially straight 46mm length section between the distal right iliac limb and the right hypogastric the rcia diameter ranged from 19 ¿ 12mm.Along the acutely angulated 36mm length section between the distal left iliac limb and the left hypogastric the rcia diameter ranged from 23 ¿ 18mm.Two (2) returned still angiograms during an intervention ( (b)(6) 2018) confirmed that both migrated limbs had been treated by extending down to just short of the hypogastric arteries; bilaterally.It is possible that disease progression (iliac artery dilatation) and aneurysm morphology changes (vessel angulation) may have contributed to the bilateral limb migration.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|