| Model Number |
456.315S |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
01/25/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
There was no known reported patient involvement associated with the complained event.Additional device product code: hwc.Due to the intra-operative events, the device was not successfully implanted.An alternate device was used to complete procedural step.As such, implant/explant dates are not applicable.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that in preparation for a short trochanteric femoral nail advanced (tfna) in the proximal femur procedure on (b)(6) 2018 the internal locking piece within a sterile ti cannulated trochanteric fixation nail fell out.The scrub tech was getting the device ready for the procedure, when he pulled the plastic piece out of the device (per procedure) and the internal locking piece came out along with it.The device was taken off of the field and another device was used in the procedure.The reported device was never used in surgery or in a patient.There was no procedure or patient involvement reported.This is report 1 of 1 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Dhr review was completed.Part number: 456.315s synthes lot number: h473024 supplier lot number: n/a release to warehouse date: 18-oct-2017 expiration date: 30-sep-2026 manufactured by synthes (b)(4) no ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Customer quality conducted an investigation of the returned device.Device condition: the nail (part 456.315s, lot h473024, mfg 18-oct-2017) was received at us cq with the locking mechanism loosely set in the nail.The complaint condition was could not be confirmed.A functional test was performed and the locking mechanism was able to be fully engaged and disengaged.Replication of the complaint condition is not applicable for this complaint condition.Lot number review: dhr review showed no ncr¿s were generated during production.The material, and material properties of the returned part were determined to be conforming at the time of manufacture based on review of the dhr(s).Drawing review: the tabulated drawing was reviewed; dimensional analysis was not performed as the mechanism functioned as intended at us cq.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Conclusion: the complaint condition is unconfirmed as the device (part 456.315s, lot h473024) was received functional.A device inspection, functional test, device history record review and drawing review were performed as part of this investigation.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.While no definitive root cause could be determined it is possible that the mechanism encountered off axis or high forces when being prepared for surgery.No new malfunctions were observed during the course of this investigation.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The subject device has been received and the product evaluation is in progress.No conclusion can be drawn.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|