|
Corrected data: date of infection is not known.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that a hardware removal and revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2018.The initial surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2018 for an open reduction and internal fixation of the distal radius.The hardware removal was due to two (2) 2.7 mm proximal cortical screws backing out of the bone.During the surgery there was a lot of fluid in the wound indicating a possible infection.Five cultures were taken to see if an infection is present but results are not yet available.The hardware that was removed was one (1) 2.4 mm variable angle locking compression plate (va-lcp) 2 column volar distal radius plate, five (5) 1.8 mm buttress screws, one (1) 2.4 mm cortical locking screw, and two (2) 2.7 mm cortical screws.All parts were intact with no malfunctions.Patient was revised to a dorsal spanning plate and six (6) 2.7 mm locking screws.There were no surgical delays, x-rays are not available, surgery was completed successfully and patient outcome was stable.This is report 1 of 4 for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Dhr review was completed.Part number: 02.111.621, synthes lot number: 3714512 , release to warehouse date: 22.Feb.2011, manufacturing site: mezzovico.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Customer quality conducted an investigation of the returned device.Device condition: the plate was received intact with surface and thread wear consistent with implant and explant.Each locking hole was functionally tested with the returned mating screws/buttress pins and found to function as intended.No defects were identified.Based on the provided information no determination regarding the reported infection can be concluded.Thus, as no issue was identified, the complaint condition for this device could not be confirmed and could not be replicated.Lot number review: no ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The lot went through the required steps during the inspection at the time of manufacturing and the dhr records showed no issues concerning the material.Additionally, the plate was identified to have been sold non-sterile.Release to warehouse date: 22.Feb.2011 drawing review: based on the date of manufacture the following drawings, reflecting the current and manufactured revision, were reviewed.2.4mm va-lcp two column volar distal radius plate: during the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Dimensional inspection was not completed as the condition is related to infection.Additionally, the device was found to be fully functional with the returned screws and no defects were identified with the device or during the manufacture of the device.Conclusion: based on the provided information no determination regarding the reported infection can be concluded.Thus, as no issue was identified, the complaint condition for this device could not be confirmed.A device history record (dhr) review, device inspection, and drawing review were performed as part of this investigation.No defects were identified with the returned device and no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.No malfunctions were observed during the course of this investigation.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Initial medwatch indicated information was correction.Information was initial information, not a correction device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|