|
Additional patient identifier reported as (b)(6).Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.A review of the device history records has been requested and is currently pending completion.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
A device history record (dhr) review was performed for part number: 03.622.005, synthes lot number: 6478816, supplier lot number: n/a: release to warehouse date: 17-nov-2010, expiration date: n/a, supplier: (b)(4).No non-conformance reports (ncrs) were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition.A product investigation was performed.Product was not returned, but photo was provided which showed the distal tip of the 7+ year old reusable instrument sheared off/broke.The break pattern appears to be transverse.An x-ray was also provided which showed the fragment in the patient.Therefore, this complaint is confirmed.Whether this complaint can be replicated at customer quality (cq) via functional test is not applicable for this complaint condition.No new malfunctions were identified as a result of the investigation.The material and relevant material properties were determined to be conforming at the time of manufacture based on review of the dhr.A dimensional inspection could not be performed at cq because the device was not returned.Relevant drawing was reviewed during this investigation.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed.The appropriate dimensions, material (17-4 ph 900) and finishing processes for a successful device design are called out, the design of this device was not found to have contributed to this complaint.The 03.622.005 probe is used with the pangea system, the matrix deformity system and uss system, these technique guides were reviewed.This device is used to open the pedicle canal.The depth markings indicate the approximate length of screw which should be used.The root cause is ultimately unknown however this failure may be the result of an extreme loading force applied to the handle while the probe was rigidly fixed, and dense patient bone may also be a contributing factor.If an extreme loading force is applied this can cause stress that may affect the tensile strength of the material.No design issues or manufacturing discrepancies were identified as a result of this investigation.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Corrected data: complainant device is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/ investigation.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|