• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MECTA CORPORATION MECTA SPECTRUM 5000Q; ECTDEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MECTA CORPORATION MECTA SPECTRUM 5000Q; ECTDEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number SPECTRUM 5000 Q
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Death (1802); Depression (2361)
Event Date 09/17/2008
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) 2008 mecta notified of patient death.On 9/26/2008 received notice from (b)(4) technical services that an independent expert assessment of the device would be made and that we could have a representative in attendance.On 9/30/2008 received notice of acceptance that our representative, (b)(4), would atten the assessment.On 10/3/2008 received notice that the assessment would take place on 10/15/2008.On 10/3/2008 (b)(4) made arrangements to be at the assessment.On 10/16/2008 (b)(4) emailed and said the assessment gave the device a clean bill of health and said the device would go back into service.On 10/17/2008 (b)(4), director, risk management, quality and patient safety, (b)(4) emailed and said "we do not have any indication that the machine contributed to this tragic event: not from the preliminary verbal feedback from the coroner, and following the assessment of the machine on oct.15, 2008.However, we are not in possession of any documentation, and the coroner's office is reviewing the event." on 3/31/2009 (b)(4), mecta quality manager, contacted the coroner's office.He was advised "that no report was available, nor would one be available for 8 months.Further, mecta would not be able to obtain the coroner's report without authorization from the family of the deceased".Further, we would not be given any information about the family.On 8/14/2009 (b)(4) contacted (b)(4) again.She responded on 8/25/2009 that she would be returning to her office on 8/25 and would get back to us then.On 8/27/2009 (b)(4), president of mecta, emailed (b)(4) asking for a copy of the assessment report.On 8/13, 8/26, 8/27, 9/1/2009 audit by fda, issued a 483 for not filing mdr report for this event on 8/28/2009 (b)(4) sent us a copy of the device assessment report.On 9/3/2009 sent letter to fda regarding the 483 that included extensive documentation of our followup as well as our rationale for not reporting the event.On 10/12/2009 (b)(4) added a note to our file addressing our decision not to report this event to the fda.
 
Event Description
A patient died in the recovery area shortly after receiving an ect treatment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MECTA SPECTRUM 5000Q
Type of Device
ECTDEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MECTA CORPORATION
19799 sw 95th ave. suite b
tualatin OR 97062
Manufacturer (Section G)
MECTA CORPORATION
19799 sw 95th avenue suite b
tualatin OR 97062
Manufacturer Contact
robin nicol
19799 sw 95th avenue suite b
tualatin, OR 97062
5036126780
MDR Report Key7294052
MDR Text Key100883277
Report Number3020533-2018-00013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GXC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K965070
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Inspection
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/12/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/23/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSPECTRUM 5000 Q
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/17/2008
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age81 YR
-
-