|
(b)(4).Complaint conclusion: as reported by a healthcare professional, post procedure of a coil embolization with a pulserider (301d, w3090-16), the patient displayed atypical behavior when coming out of anesthesia.Upon subsequent evaluation under fluoro it was determined the patient¿s anterior cerebral vessel (a1) was blocked.The patient was taken back to the table and after several runs under fluoro the vessel opened.The patient¿s symptoms resolved with no residual and is now fully functional and back to work.This was a coil embolization to an intra-aneurysm to the right middle cerebral artery (mca).The aneurysm was 6.6 mm in height, 5.6 mm in width and 5.8 mm in depth.The neck size was 6.8 mm and the target vessel size was 2.8.The vessel was mildly tortuous.The pulserider was successfully placed in the right middle cerebral artery (mca) using a 5 mm prowler select plus microcatheter.In addition to the pulserider device, 6 orbit coils were used to successfully placed to embolize the aneurysm.The procedure was deemed successful by the physician as the aneurysm was effectively embolized.The physician does not feel the incident was associated with the pulserider device.Concomitant devices include a 7f cook shuttle sheath, a.021 prowler select plus (psp), 2 eschelon 20 (2.1f), 5f navien catheter, and a.014 guidewire.Additional information received indicated that the physician is uncertain on what caused the a1 blockage, but feels there were underling physical issues that contributed.He does not associate it with pr.It is unknown if the event was due to thrombus.There is no alleged pulserider malfunction.The product was not returned as it remains implanted.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.Based on the information provided, it is not possible to determine the cause of the atypical behavior and the cerebral artery blockage.Vessel occlusion including emboli (air, tissue, thrombotic), intracranial hemorrhage, vasospasm and dissection are listed in the instructions for use (ifu) as possible complications with the pulserider; however, pending additional information, the root cause of the blockage cannot be determined.The information provided indicated that the cause of the arterial blockage was thrombus.The percentage of blockage was not determined; however, proper flow was not occurring and the thrombus was treated with reopro it was reported that the coils were perfectly maintained by the pulserider, and the device was positioned at the desired location without movement.The physician did not think the event was related to the pulserider and refused to provide any additional information.It is unknown how close the thrombus was to the pulserider device.Thrombosis is a known potential complication associated with the pulserider.Typical antiplatelet and anticoagulation regimen used for interventional intracranial procedures is recommended at the discretion of the treating physician.Based on the information provided, the root cause of the thrombus could not be determined; however, patient or pharmacologic factors may have contributed to the event.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective/preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
|
|
As reported by a healthcare professional, post procedure of a coil embolization with a pulserider (301d, w3090-16), the patient displayed atypical behavior when coming out of anesthesia.Upon subsequent evaluation under fluro it was determined the patient¿s anterior cerebral vessel (a1) was blocked.The patient was take back to the table and after several runs under fluro the vessel opened.The patient¿s symptoms resolved with no residual and is now fully functional and back to work.This was a coil embolization to an intra-aneurysm to the right middle cerebral artery (mca).The aneurysm was 6.6 mm in height, 5.6 mm in width and 5.8 mm in depth.The neck size was 6.8 mm and the target vessel size was 2.8.The vessel was mildly tortuous.The pulserider was successfully placed in the right middle cerebral artery (mca) using a 5 mm prowler select plus microcatheter.In addition to the pulserider device, 6 orbit coils were used to successfully placed to embolize the aneurysm.The procedure was deemed successful by the physician as the aneurysm was effectively embolized.The physician does not feel the incident was associated with the pulserider device.Concomitant devices include a 7f cook shuttle sheath, a.021 prowler select plus (psp), 2 eschelon 20 (2.1f), 5f navien catheter, and a.014 guidewire.Additional information received indicated that the physician is uncertain on what caused the a1 blockage, but feels there were underling physical issues that contributed.He does not associate it with pr.It is unknown if the event was due to thrombus.There is no alleged pulserider malfunction.Additional information received indicated that the physician felt there was thrombus.The coils were perfectly maintained in the aneurysm sac.It is uncertain how close the blockage was to the pulserider.The angiography showed that the pulserider was positioned at the desired location without movement.The exact percentage of the occlusion was not determined but proper flow was not occurring.The patient was administered with 20 mg of reapro, 22 mg of reapro, 2 mg iv.The patient experienced the atypical behavior immediately upon waking up.
|