• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS - HOUSTON PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS - HOUSTON PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 103
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Neck Pain (2433); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 05/13/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Uchida, d & yamamoto, t.(2017).Experience and solution of complications of vagus nerve stimulation therapy in 139 implant patients.No shinkei geka, 45(12):1051-1057.Doi: 10.11477/mf.1436203646.
 
Event Description
High lead impedance was observed during a system diagnostic test during an outpatient visit.The patient underwent lead and generator replacement surgery several months later to resolve the high impedance.The explanted lead and generator were returned to the manufacturer for analysis.Information received indicated that the physician contacted the distributor for an emergency revision surgery because the patient was complaining of painful stimulation in the neck.The physician then performed diagnostics and saw the high impedance warning.The physician suspected a lead fracture based on x-ray images.The cause of the fracture was believed to be due to generator twiddling by the patient.Further information received indicates that the patient could recognize the auras associated with his seizures and would try to stop the seizures using the magnet on his own; he sometimes groped the location of the generator, strongly grabbing it and moving it.The treating physician believes the patient's manipulation of the device is the cause of the suspected lead fracture.A photo of the explanted lead and generator showed clear evidence of patient manipulation of the implanted device.Analysis of the returned generator revealed no anomalies with the performance of the generator.The generator performed according to functional specifications.Analysis of the returned lead revealed no anomalies.A portion of the lead assembly, including the electrodes, was not returned for analysis, and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, and no discontinuities were identified.The bilumen tubing appeared to be wavy in some areas and was returned in a coiled or twisted manner.An abstract from a research article comprised of post-market surveillance data from a hospital¿s vns patients implanted between december 2010 and march 2016 was received several years after the event occurred.The abstract indicated that four patients experienced recurrent vocal cord paralysis.The abstract also indicated that one patient experienced subsequent aspiration pneumonia.Three patients underwent explant due to surgical site infections, and one patient underwent explant due to a patient-influenced revolving of the generator which eventually resulted in lead fracture.The recurrent vocal cord paralysis is reported within mfr.Report # 1644487-2018-00123.A company representative received identifying patient information from the authoring physicians of the article for the patients who experienced surgical-site infections and generator migration and subsequent lead fracture, originally captured in mfr.Report #1644487-2018-00122.It was determined that the infections were previously reported to the manufacturer and are captured in mfr.Report #s 1644487-2013-02562, 1644487-2013-03225, and 1644487-2015-06368.The reported patient-influenced migration and subsequent lead fracture is captured within this report, mfr.Report # 1644487-2018-00289.Per the abstract, the patient revolved the generator underneath the skin, causing the lead fracture and necessitated vns explant.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 103
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS - HOUSTON
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS - HOUSTON
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key7298219
MDR Text Key100998708
Report Number1644487-2018-00289
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/03/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date11/30/2014
Device Model Number103
Device Lot Number3494
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/20/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/01/2018
Initial Date FDA Received02/26/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/13/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age29 YR
-
-