|
Device evaluation: the product was not returned to the manufacturing site.Therefore, product testing could not be performed and the customer¿s reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product was reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search on complaints revealed that no other complaints have been received for this production order number.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) was reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions along with warnings for the proper use and handling of the device.As a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.Additional information received reported the implant date was (b)(6) 2018, and the explant date was (b)(6) 2018.Lens was replaced with an unknown type lens.There was an incision enlargement performed and one (1) suture was used.The reason for the explant was because of an unexpected post-operative refraction, with a visual acuity of 2500, at the patient's 1-day post-operative visit.The patient's current visual acuity is 20/40 uncorrected and 20/20 corrected.The patient is a male, with a date of birth of (b)(6), and operative eye was the right.No additional information was provided.Age/date of birth: (b)(6).Gender/sex: male.If implanted, give date: (b)(6) 2018.If explanted, give date: (b)(6) 2018.(b)(4).All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|