• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. G2 FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. G2 FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RF310F
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Malposition of Device (2616); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Extrusion (2934)
Patient Problems Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Abdominal Pain (1685); Great Vessel Perforation (2152); Cardiac Perforation (2513); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 05/25/2007
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a manufacturing review could not be performed.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the alleged perforation of the ivc, filter limb detachment, removal difficulties, and tilting of the filter as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the filter.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warnings/potential complications: filter fractures are a known complication of vena cava filters.There have been some reports of serious pulmonary and cardiac complications with vena cava filters requiring the retrieval of the fragment utilizing endovascular and/or surgical techniques.Movement, migration or tilt of the filter are known complications of vena cava filters.Perforation or other acute or chronic damage of the ivc wall filter tilt.- filter malposition.(b)(4).The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter tilted, perforated the ivc, and a filter limb detached and embolized to the right ventricle.An open abdominal procedure was performed to retrieve the filter; however, it is unknown if the retrieval attempt was successful.A detached filter limb remains in the patient's right ventricle.The status of the patient was not provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a lot history review was performed.This is the only complaint to date for this lot number.Therefore, a device history record review is not required.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately sixteen days post deployment, computed tomography angio chest revealed intraluminal defect in an inferior branch of the right pulmonary artery consistent with a small pulmonary embolus.Around nine years and five months later, a computed tomography abdomen and pelvis revealed that the filter¿s medial struts had fractured and migrated into the right ventricle.Around three months later, a computed tomography chest revealed there was a linear metallic density at the right ventricular apex likely representing the dislodged filter strut.The tip of the strut was noted to extend to the right ventricular wall.Filter in an infra renal position and 11 filter struts were noted.The next day, foreign body object removal was planned.Attempts were made to snare it using a 10mm micro snare but was unsuccessful.Around two days later, foreign body object removal was planned again.Attempts were made to snare it using a 10mm micro snare but was unsuccessful.Around three days later, under fluoroscopic guidance, the location of the foreign body was identified in the right ventricle anterior wall near the apex.Around one month later, the patient was noted to have a fractured filter strut having migrated to the right ventricle where it was imbedded.Some extraluminal displacement of some of the filter legs.Around four months later, a computed tomography abdomen and pelvis revealed there was filter strut seen in the right ventricle which was stable.Around one year and six months later, a computed tomography angio chest revealed unchanged thin metallic strut embedded at apex right lateral ventricle and adjacent intraventricular septum.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for filter limb detachment, retrieval difficulties and perforation of ivc.However, the investigation is inconclusive for filter tilt.Additionally, it can be confirmed that the patient experienced pe post deployment.However, the relationship to the filter is unknown.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter tilted, perforated the ivc, and a filter limb detached and embolized to the right ventricle.An open abdominal procedure was performed to retrieve the filter; however, it is unknown if the retrieval attempt was successful.A detached filter limb remains in the patient's right ventricle.The status of the patient was not provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
G2 FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1415 w. 3rd street
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key7299093
MDR Text Key101025542
Report Number2020394-2018-00157
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K062887
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/27/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRF310F
Device Lot NumberGFQI0210
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/21/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ALBUTEROL SULFATE, ENALAPRIL, GABAPENTIN; CHOLECALCIFEROL, WARFARIN AND MULTIVITAMIN; OXYCONTIN, PERCOCET, PROAIR HFA, TRIAMTERENE
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention; Other;
Patient Age42 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight136 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-