|
Patient¿s height reported as (b)(6) cms.Date of post-operative infection and non-union development is unknown.Complainant device is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.A device history record (dhr) review was performed for part number: sd480.110, lot number: h374993: part manufacture date: 24 may 2017, manufacturing location: (b)(4) synthes usa, part expiration date: n/a, nonconformance noted: n/a: dhr record review: a review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot of ti patient specific plate mandible product was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework nor nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A review of the raw material device history record revealed this lot met all specifications with no nonconformance noted.This raw material lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of manufacture with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|