| Model Number |
RV135610 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Retraction Problem (1536)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
02/09/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No medical records and no medical images were provided to the manufacturer.The lot number for the device was provided.The device history records are currently under review.The device is pending return.The investigation is currently under way.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that prior to the first inflation of a pta balloon dilatation catheter, the catheter allegedly became lodged within the sheath; therefore, the catheter and the sheath were removed together as a single unit without incident.Reportedly, another device was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device history records were reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only event reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.The device was returned for evaluation.A visual inspection found the device returned stuck in the user's introducer sheath.The distal tip of the device was protruding from the distal end of the sheath.The distal end of the sheath was flared, and balloon material was noted to be bunched at the tip.Bunching in the outer catheter shaft was also noted proximal to the sheath hub.Based on the device stuck in the device, the bunching noted to the device, and flared sheath tip, the investigation is confirmed for the reported sheath-related retraction issue.The definitive root cause for the identified retraction issue could not be determined based upon available information.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural issues contributed to the event.Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warnings: when the catheter is exposed to the vascular system, it should be manipulated while under high-quality fluoroscopic observation.Do not advance or retract the catheter unless the balloon is fully deflated.If resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.Applying excessive force to the catheter can result in tip breakage or balloon separation.Do not exceed the rbp recommended for this device.Balloon rupture may occur if the rbp rating is exceeded.To prevent over pressurization, use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended.Precautions: if resistance is felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter through the introducer sheath, determine if contrast is trapped in the balloon with fluoroscopy.If contrast is present, push the balloon out of the sheath and then completely evacuate the contrast before proceeding to withdraw the balloon.If resistance is felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter, it is recommended to remove the balloon catheter, introducer sheath and guidewire (as necessary) as a single unit.Use of the rival pta dilatation catheter: while maintaining negative pressure and the position of the guidewire, grasp the balloon catheter just outside the sheath and withdraw the deflated dilatation catheter over the wire through the introducer sheath.Use of a gentle counterclockwise motion may be used to help facilitate catheter removal through the introducer sheath.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that prior to the first inflation of a pta balloon dilatation catheter, the catheter allegedly became lodged within the sheath; therefore, the catheter and the sheath were removed together as a single unit without incident.Reportedly, another device was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|