| Catalog Number |
3542450M |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) caucasian female underwent breast augmentation revision with a mentor siltex round spectrum post-operatively adjustable 325cc saline prosthesis and experienced deflation post procedure.As a result, unilateral prosthesis replacement was performed on (b)(6) 2018.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The investigation of the returned device was completed by the failure analysis lab on 6/26/2018.Device evaluation summary: it was reported that a (b)(6) caucasian female underwent breast augmentation revision with a mentor siltex round spectrum post-operatively adjustable 325cc saline prosthesis and experienced deflation post procedure.Upon receipt by mentor, the device returned without fluid.Red material was observed within the device.No foreign material was observed on the shell surface.The product evaluation team discovered a rent measuring approximately 0.5 cm within an area of siltex cracking on the posterior aspect.No other anomalies were discovered.The complaint was confirmed since a rupture was found on the device.However, at this point it is not possible to determine the root cause of such damage or the etiology of the red material found on the device.Siltex cracking is defined as a material separation occurring in the siltex layer and can eventually progress through the shell of siltex devices.Mentor believes that siltex cracking is ultimately a result of high stresses caused by acute folds (i.E., severe ¿v¿ or tight folds) in the rtv shell of siltex breast implants.There is no evidence that the issue is related with manufacturing.Because the product evaluation team was unable to confirm any unusual failure mode, no corrective action will be taken at this time.Breast implants are not considered lifetime devices and deflation is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our product insert data sheet.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation on 3/20/2018.The analysis has begun, but is not complete at this time.When the investigation and analysis have been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Additional information was received on 4/9/2018.The event date has been updated.The final fill volume of the impacted product was 350ccs.The device was replaced with a 350cc mentor memorygel breast implant, catalog #3543501, serial #: (b)(4).Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|