• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems Corroded (1131); Fracture (1260); High impedance (1291)
Patient Problems No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); Fibrosis (3167)
Event Date 02/13/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient's device was found to show high lead impedance.It was noted that if the leads were revised, the generator would also be prophylactically replaced to minimize number of surgeries for the patient.No surgery has occurred to date.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
A full revision surgery occurred.It was noted that the patient's replacement lead was implanted on the right vagus nerve due to fibrosis on the left vagus nerve.It is indicated per labeling that fibrosis between the nerve and electrode is a possible cause of high lead impedance.Follow up with the physician's office provided the settings and diagnostics of the patient's device prior to replacement.The system diagnostics indicated high impedance, end of service (eos) = no.No devices were received to date.No additional relevant information was received to date.
 
Event Description
The patient's explanted devices were returned for analysis.Product analysis was completed for the generator and lead.The generator performed according to functional specifications and analysis of the device found no abnormalities or malfunctions.The explanted lead was returned in five portions.Visual examination of the portions found that the setscrew marks were observed on the connector pin, indicating a proper mechanical contact between the conductive surfaces of both the generator and connector pin, ensuring a good electrical connection with the lead.The quadfilar coil 1 appeared to be broken near the anchor tether.Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area on three of the broken coil strands as being mechanically damaged, with pitting and residual material.Pitting was observed on the coil surface, and was likely related to stimulation present for a certain period of time.No other anomalies were noted.Based on the findings from product analysis, there was evidence to suggest a discontinuity in the returned portions of the device.Note that since the positive and negative electrodes were not returned, no analysis could be performed on those portions of the lead.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key7326901
MDR Text Key102086346
Report Number1644487-2018-00352
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/21/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/09/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/28/2005
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number7763
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/01/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received05/01/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/04/2003
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age32 YR
-
-