|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Other relevant history: pre-existing conditions.Investigation/evaluation: the actual complaint device was not returned.Without the complaint device, a physical investigation was not able to be completed.Imaging was provided for review.A documentation investigation was performed.A review of the provided imaging, device history record, instructions for use, and quality control data was conducted.According to the image review, although 11 image files from the zsle deployment of a contralateral leg are provided, only four are unique.Of these, three are so close temporally, that no progress in unsheathing occurred on these three images.Consequently, regarding the unsheathing, only two unique images are provided along with the complaint report.The first three images were obtained after the first 40mm of the zsle had been unsheathed inside and then slightly beyond the zimb contralateral gate.Gate insertion was approximately to the depth expected with an attached marker.At 40mm of unsheathing, the bi-lobed proximal zsle marker was outside the sheath approximately 13mm inferior to its expected attachment location on the zsle.The marker slightly rotates on the three images but otherwise does not move.As the zsle was unsheathed by 45mm, the markers again slightly rotated but otherwise did not move.This supported the complaint report's assertion that the markers were entrapped in the aneurysm sac rather than embolizing.Detachment of the zsle marker is confirmed.Because the marker moved distally, then stopped, but was still free to rotate slightly as if dangling, it may have been tethered to a loose suture rather than completely detached.The device history record was reviewed, 5759437 (finished assembly) and sa5698498(graft), no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode were noted.Each zenith device is shipped with instructions for use (ifu) listing the indications for use, contraindications, warnings and precautions, and the correct deployment procedure.The ifu advises on appropriate patient follow-up so that changes in the structure, should they occur, can be identified and addressed before causing clinical problems.The qc specifications and the device history record were reviewed and no evidence was found that the device was manufactured out of specification.One nonconformance was found but was not related to this failure.The image reviewer reported that the zsle marker appeared to be free to rotate as if it were dangling.This may occur if the marker was tethered to a loose suture rather than completely detached.No information is given to suggest the device was not manufactured to specification.No related non-conformances were found during a review of the device history record.Since the gold marker appeared to be dangling from a loose suture, it is possible that the marker detached after the manufacturing process.This may have occurred during shipping or during the deployment procedure.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.The appropriate cook personnel have been notified of this event.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.H3 other text : blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Other relevant history: pre-existing conditions.Investigation/evaluation: the actual complaint device was not returned.Without the complaint device, a physical investigation was not able to be completed.Imaging was provided for review.A documentation investigation was performed.A review of the provided imaging, device history record, instructions for use, and quality control data was conducted.According to the image review, although 11 image files from the zsle deployment of a contralateral leg are provided, only four are unique.Of these, three are so close temporally, that no progress in unsheathing occurred on these three images.Consequently, regarding the unsheathing, only two unique images are provided along with the complaint report.The first three images were obtained after the first 40mm of the zsle had been unsheathed inside and then slightly beyond the zimb contralateral gate.Gate insertion was approximately to the depth expected with an attached marker.At 40mm of unsheathing, the bi-lobed proximal zsle marker was outside the sheath approximately 13mm inferior to its expected attachment location on the zsle.The marker slightly rotates on the three images but otherwise does not move.As the zsle was unsheathed by 45mm, the markers again slightly rotated but otherwise did not move.This supported the complaint report's assertion that the markers were entrapped in the aneurysm sac rather than embolizing.Detachment of the zsle marker is confirmed.Because the marker moved distally, then stopped, but was still free to rotate slightly as if dangling, it may have been tethered to a loose suture rather than completely detached.The device history record was reviewed, 5759437 (finished assembly) and sa5698498(graft), no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode were noted.Each zenith device is shipped with instructions for use (ifu) listing the indications for use, contraindications, warnings and precautions, and the correct deployment procedure.The ifu advises on appropriate patient follow-up so that changes in the structure, should they occur, can be identified and addressed before causing clinical problems.The qc specifications and the device history record were reviewed and no evidence was found that the device was manufactured out of specification.One nonconformance was found but was not related to this failure.The image reviewer reported that the zsle marker appeared to be free to rotate as if it were dangling.This may occur if the marker was tethered to a loose suture rather than completely detached.No information is given to suggest the device was not manufactured to specification.No related non-conformances were found during a review of the device history record.Since the gold marker appeared to be dangling from a loose suture, it is possible that the marker detached after the manufacturing process.This may have occurred during shipping or during the deployment procedure.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.The appropriate cook personnel have been notified of this event.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|