|
It was reported that during an unspecified procedure, the cxi support catheter hub fell off during contralateral advancement of the catheter from the left femoral artery to the severely stenosed lesion.Another cxi support catheter of the same lot was utilized to successfully complete the procedure.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Investigation ¿ evaluation.A review of the dimensional verification, complaint history, device history record, documentation, drawing, quality control, specifications, and a visual inspection and functional evaluation of the returned device were conducted during the investigation.The visual inspection of the returned device confirmed that the proximal fitting (hub) was separated from the shaft of the catheter.The strain relief was removed from the hub for further examination, and it was discovered that a small fragment of the catheter material was retained in the hub.The proximal separated end of the catheter was twisted, which prevented the advancement of a test guide wire.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record showed no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.It should be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, the examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A review of the dimensional verification, complaint history, device history record, documentation, drawing, quality control, specifications, and a visual inspection and functional evaluation of the returned device were conducted during the investigation.The visual inspection of the returned device confirmed that the proximal fitting (hub) was separated from the shaft of the catheter.The strain relief was removed from the hub for further examination, and it was discovered that a small fragment of the catheter material was retained in the hub.The proximal separated end of the catheter was twisted, which prevented the advancement of a test guide wire.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record showed no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.It should be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, the examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|