BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE NC EMERGE®; CATHETERS, TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, PERCUTANEOUS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number H7493926715250 |
Device Problem
Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 02/13/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4) - attachment: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported via medwatch (b)(4) that balloon detachment occurred.The target lesion was located in a non-tortuous, mildly calcified circumflex (cx)/obtuse marginal branch (om) bifurcation.A 2.0 x 15 mm nc emerge balloon was inflated twice at 18 atmospheres.After the lesion was stented, the same 2.0 x 15 nc emerge balloon was advanced but resistance was encountered while trying to cross the stent struts.The balloon was left partially in the om from the cx.A 5.0 x 15 mm nc emerge balloon was advanced to the cx in an attempt to help the 2.0 x 15 mm balloon move forward to dilate the stent struts from the cx.Resistance was encountered on both balloons but the physician did not consider the resistance to be more than usual.The 5.0 balloon was removed and when an attempt was made to remove the 2.5 balloon, the balloon separated inside the patient about 5 mm from where the clear, soft portion of the balloon and the back soft portion started.A wire was twisted around the balloon to get the detached portion into the guide catheter.Another balloon was then inflated at low pressure to pin the broken 2.5 balloon into the guide so it could be removed.The procedure was completed.There were no patient complications and the patient¿s status is fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr: returned product consisted of a nc emerge balloon catheter in two pieces.The balloon was loosely folded with blood in the inflation lumen and balloon.The outer shaft, inner shaft, balloon and tip were microscopically examined.The shaft is completely separated 23.8cm from the distal tip.The fractured/separated ends of the shaft were stretched and jagged which indicates the shaft separation was due to tensile forces.The tip is damaged.There are numerous hyptotube and shaft kinks.Inspection of the remainder of the device presented no other damage or irregularities.The investigation conclusion is operational context as the product meets the design and manufacture specification but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance was limited.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported via medwatch # 2300530000-2018-8002 that balloon detachment occurred.The target lesion was located in a non-tortuous, mildly calcified circumflex (cx)/obtuse marginal branch (om) bifurcation.A 2.0x15mm nc emerge balloon was inflated twice at 18 atmospheres.After the lesion was stented, the same 2.0x15 nc emerge balloon was advanced but resistance was encountered while trying to cross the stent struts.The balloon was left partially in the om from the cx.A 5.0x15mm nc emerge balloon was advanced to the cx in an attempt to help the 2.0x15mm balloon move forward to dilate the stent struts from the cx.Resistance was encountered on both balloons but the physician did not consider the resistance to be more than usual.The 5.0 balloon was removed and when an attempt was made to remove the 2.5 balloon, the balloon separated inside the patient about 5mm from where the clear, soft portion of the balloon and the back soft portion started.A wire was twisted around the balloon to get the detached portion into the guide catheter.Another balloon was then inflated at low pressure to pin the broken 2.5 balloon into the guide so it could be removed.The procedure was completed.There were no patient complications and the patient¿s status is fine.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|