(b)(4).The guide wire is being filed under a separate medwatch report.Evaluation summary: visual and functional inspections were performed on the returned devices the reported difficulties were confirmed.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.The investigation determined the difficulties were likely due to case circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a moderately tortuous and moderately calcified left superficial femoral artery.A 5.0 x 100 mm armada 18 balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was used; however, it met resistance with a 4.0 x 300 cm steelcore guide wire when the bdc was advancing over the guide wire.Positioning was lost; therefore, both devices were removed as a single unit and another unspecified bdc and a guide wire were used to successfully complete the procedure.There was resistance between the armada bdc and the guide wire during removal.There was a delay in the procedure but it was not clinically significant, and there were no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
|