|
Patient information is unknown.Date of event is unknown.Implant date is unknown.Explant date is unknown.Therapy date of concomitant device is unknown.A device history record review was requested.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that a trochanteric fixation nail advanced (tfna) nail exchange was performed on (b)(6) 2018 due to a spiral blade backing out.The initial surgery was for a tfna roughly six weeks ago.The nail and blade were removed successfully and intact.The revision surgery was successful.There were no surgical delays and no x-rays are available.Patient outcome was satisfactory.Concomitant part: 11mm/130 degree ti cann tfna (part: 04.037.144s, lot: h441055, quantity one).(b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.A device history record (dhr) review was performed for part number: 04.038.305s, lot number: h341748, date of manufacture: 23 may 2017, place of manufacture: elmira, part expiration date: 30 april 2027 nonconformance noted: nr-0067805.A review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot of tfna helical blade 105mm sterile product was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework nor nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A review of the raw material device history record revealed this lot met all specifications but there was a nonconformance noted, nr-0067805.This nr was for scrapping 123 lbs of the 395 lb lot of raw material received for a bent bar straightness non-conformance.This nonconformance had no effect on the complaint as the nonconforming bars would not feed into the production machine.The remaining 272 lbs of this raw material lot conformed and was accepted.This raw material lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of manufacture with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.This lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release.Nonconformance nr-0067805 is not relevant to the complaint condition as bent out of tolerance nonconforming bars would not feed into the production machine.A product investigation was performed.The returned helical blade (part# 04.037.305s, lot# h341748) was examined and was found to be without identifiable defect or deficiency which may have contributed to the reported complaint condition; minimal finish wear was noted where the device would interact with the nail (04.037.144 lot h441055).The helical blade was able to be inserted in the returned nail and locked securely into position.Relevant drawings for the returned device were reviewed (both current revision and from the time of manufacture): top-level (04_038_270 revision b).The design, materials and finishing processes were found to be appropriate for the intended use of this device.No dimensional analysis is applicable as the complaint condition was unable to be replicated and no defects or deficiencies were identified with the returned device.A device history review, including material review, was performed for the returned implant¿s lot number and complaint-related issues were identified with the lot number which may have contributed to the complaint condition.The tfna risk document adequately addresses the complaint condition (action a-679454).Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|