| Model Number |
710200S |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Death (1802)
|
| Date of Event |
02/06/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Death
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Exemption number e2015012.B.Braun medical inc (importer) is submitting this report on behalf of b.Braun avitum ag (manufacturer).This report has been identified as b.Braun avitum internal report # (b)(4).The device involved was not received for evaluation; however, the trend data was provided and reviewed.A preliminary review of the trend data shows the machine worked and reacted in each case as intended.Also, there is no evidence of a malfunction of the device.At the estimate time of the patient's medical status change, the machine triggered several alarms recognizing this change.A follow-up report will be filed when the investigation is complete.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported by the user facility: it was reported that a patient coded on a machine.The paramedics were called to the scene and cpr was administered.The patient is deceased.The customer is reluctant to give any information before speaking to his risk department.He stated,"the death is not because of the machine so why do you need the information? have you ever called a davita and asked this information in the past? i will need to speak with risk management before i give anything else out.I am not trying to make your job harder but i want to be careful." it was indicated that there was minimal documentation done during the time of the event in (b)(6), 2018.When asked for patient vital signs, etc, it was stated this is why b.Braun was contacted to pull that information from the logs.The patient was a female born in (b)(6) 1932.She was pronounced deceased at the hospital after cpr was started in the facility by staff.Paramedics were called and took over care and transported to the hospital.The event occurred after therapy was over and after rinse back was completed.The machine was inspected by customer trained technician and released back into service.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Exemption number e2015012.B.Braun medical inc (importer) is submitting this report on behalf of b.Braun avitum ag (manufacturer).This report has been identified as b.Braun avitum internal report # (b)(4).The event occurred after therapy was over and after the rinse back was completed.The customer refused to disclose more detailed information but stated that the death was not because of the machine.The dialog+ dialysis machine was inspected by the customer's technician.It operated as intended and was returned into service.The trend data analysis showed an inconspicuous preparation phase.During therapy, some blood side pressure alarms were triggered.Following each alarm the machine switched into patient-safe mode.All the alarms might occur during therapy and none of them gives any indication of a malfunction of the dialog+ machine.These alarms were triggered because the respective pressure limits were slightly exceeded and there were also some follow-up alarms triggered following the mentioned pressure alarms, for example, an alarm indicating the stop of the blood pump.After therapy the device was put into end of therapy (eot) mode (reinfusion).At the end of this first eot phase, there was still "red" detected at the red detector (rdv) of the safety air detector (sad) and the device was put back into therapy mode.Shortly after returning into therapy mode, the blood pump was stopped, the dialyzer coupling(s) were removed from the dialyzer and rdv stopped detecting "red".This sequence of events is deviating from the standard procedure described in the instructions for use, but this unusual proceeding does not indicate a malfunction of the device.The trend data showed also that the dialysis fluid temperature was about 34.2°c instead of 36°c as set.As this temperature is within the physiological limits, the protective system (lls) did not trigger an alarm.This finding can be explained by a slight calcification of the temperature sensors.This conclusion is supported by the fact that additional trends provided by the customer show that the dialog+ machine underwent 13 citrothermal disinfection cycles.Each of those disinfection cycles was performed without any issue.Thereafter, the temperature difference had disappeared in the trend data record.Since the temperature was always in the physiological limits and only slightly below the set value, it cannot be related to the event described.In the event the temperature might have been outside the physiologic range as defined in iec 60601-2-16 (medical electrical equipment # part 2-16: particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration equipment), the dialysis machine would have triggered an alarm and switched into patient-safe mode.Since there was no malfunction of the dialog+ dialysis machine, no further actions will be taken.B.Braun will continue to investigate, trend, and monitor all complaints of this nature.If additional pertinent information becomes available a follow-up report will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported by the user facility:
it was reported that a patient coded on a machine.The paramedics were called to the scene and cpr was administered.The patient is deceased.The customer is reluctant to give any information before speaking to his risk department.He stated,"the death is not because of the machine so why do you need the information? have you ever called a davita and asked this information in the past? i will need to speak with risk management before i give anything else out.I am not trying to make your job harder but i want to be careful."
it was indicated that there was minimal documentation done during the time of the event in (b)(6), 2018.When asked for patient vital signs, etc, it was stated this is why b.Braun was contacted to pull that information from the logs.The patient was a female born in (b)(6) 1932.She was pronounced at the hospital after cpr was started in the facility by staff.Paramedics were called and took over care and transported to the hospital.The event occurred after therapy was over and after rinse back was completed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|