(b)(4).To date, the device has not been returned.If the product is returned for evaluation, any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: how was the prineo adhesive applied on the mesh? saturated - entire mesh covered with one solid saturated coat what date did the infection occur on? doctor saw patient 20 days after and patient said it looked normal so doctor was not sure when the infection occurred.Was there any medical or surgical intervention performed? re-operation and then antibiotics.Can you identify the lot number of the product that was used? no.What is the most current patient status? hasn¿t seen the patient back post op since re-opening.Patient demographics: (b)(6), gender: f, smoker, non-compliant diabetic.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Initial procedure date the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? were there any pre-existing signs/symptoms of active infection prior to this surgical procedure? location and size of infection? date of second procedure can you describe the infection site? any pictures? please describe what was done during the reoperation? please indicate any medical /surgical interventions performed was the site cultured? if so, what bacteria were identified? what in the physicians opinion are the causative factors for the patient infection? does the surgeon believe that the dermabond/prineo contributed to the patient event? was there any alleged dermabond / prineo deficiency noted prior/during or post operatively? update to patient current condition.
|