• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY SPINE INC XPDM THORACIC PEDICLE PRB, CRV; PROBE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY SPINE INC XPDM THORACIC PEDICLE PRB, CRV; PROBE Back to Search Results
Model Number 279702040
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Injury (2348); Not Applicable (3189)
Date of Event 02/21/2018
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device is available for evaluation.Investigation will be conducted.Follow up will be filed with the investigation results.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event or Problem Description
While inserting the expedium thoracic probe into the l5 pedicle the tip of the probe broke off into the pedicle.About 20 mm.The surgeon had to drill out the pedicle in order to retrieve the tip.Also while inserting a pedicle screw the tip of the expedium poly driver broke off into the tulip,of the screw.The tip was not able to be retrieved.It remains in the screw.Patient consequence?: yes.Patient consequence description:additional exposure to anesthesia plus the l5 pedicle was almost not a viable fixation point.Is the information being submitted for this complaint all the details that are known/available regarding this event?: yes.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Visual examination of the returned device revealed a fracture of the probe¿s distal tip, approximately 40mm from the distal end.Device was then sent for fracture analysis.The fracture analysis report reveals plastic deformation at the corners and torsional shear markings following a circular pattern.This suggests that the fractured tip underwent a quasi-static overload torsional shear failure.No material defects or other abnormalities were observed in this analysis.A review of the device history record was conducted.No issues were identified during the manufacturing and release of this product that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.All complaint trends will be evaluated as a part of the depuy spine monthly complaint review meeting.A definitive root cause for the pedicle probe¿s distal tip fracturing cannot be positively determined.However, the fracture analysis report suggests that the fractured tip underwent a quasi-static overload torsional shear failure.As there has been no issue identified in the manufacturing or release of the device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer and no systemic trends were found, this complaint file will be closed with no further action required.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XPDM THORACIC PEDICLE PRB, CRV
Common Device Name
PROBE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY SPINE INC
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
MDR Report Key7357090
Report Number1526439-2018-50262
Device Sequence Number2312319
Product Code HXB
UDI-Device Identifier10705034198446
UDI-Public(01)10705034198446
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,user f
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/23/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number279702040
Device Catalogue Number279702040
Device Lot Number0610NT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/01/2018
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/23/2018
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/22/2018
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/21/2018
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/03/2018
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age60 YR
Patient Weight152
-
-