Results: the inner liner was stretched out of the lumen of the velocity.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the velocity inner liner was stretched.This type of damage likely occurred from the non-penumbra stent retriever being advanced through the velocity.If the non-penumbra stent retriever is advanced through the velocity and the stent frays the inner liner and subsequently, the liner becomes caught on the stent, damage such as this may occur.A stainless steel mandrel was advanced through the hub and out of the distal tip of the velocity without an issue.The non-penumbra stent retriever and the ace68 referred to in the complaint were not returned to penumbra for evaluation.Penumbra catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the right middle cerebral artery (mca) using a velocity delivery microcatheter (velocity).During the procedure, while using a velocity with a penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68) and non-penumbra stent retriever device, it was noticed after the second pass that there was a ¿plastic¿ type of thread sticking out of the velocity and on the stent retriever device.Therefore, the procedure was completed using the same ace68, a new velocity and stent retriever device.It is unclear where the plastic material came from.Additionally, the physician did not mention resistance while advancing or retracting the stent retriever device from the velocity.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|