|
(b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: what was the name of the procedure? patient had a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy and then returned to surgery to remove infected suture line.What was the date of the procedure? original procedure: (b)(6) 2018.Returned to or:(b)(6) 2018.What tissue was the vicryl suture used on? breast.What was the date of the patient symptoms (post op date)? came to clinic after consulting pcp and was put on antibiotics- (b)(6) 2018.What medical intervention was performed to treat the symptoms? return to the or (b)(6) 2018.Can you explain "sutures were already removed in the or so there is nothing to give to the rep"? md was referencing that during the return to the or, the sutures used were disposed of.Did the patient undergo a second procedure for suture removal? yes what was the date of the second procedure? on (b)(6) 2018.What is the surgeon opinion of the relationship of the vicryl suture to the patient reaction? dr.(b)(6) was concerned that the suture might have been the issue given the patients allergy to gluten, otherwise no concern noted.What are the patient age, gender, weight, past medical/ surgical history, allergies? (b)(6) female.Prediabetes, ovarian cyst, obesity, htn (hypertension), hirsutism, family history of breast cancer, celiac disease, adverse effect of anesthesia, what is the current condition of the patient? no, other issues at this time.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Can you advise if the patient infection was bilateral (in both breasts)? were cultures performed of the wound? what were the results?.
|