|
A customer in (b)(6) contacted biomérieux to report a misidentification of candida auris as candida haemulonii in association with the vitek® 2 yst id test kit.An internal biomérieux investigation was performed.The customer submitted two (2) isolates and both isolates were subbed, and testing included both yst customer card lots (2430456103, 2430562103) and a random lot, run in duplicate on v08.01 software.Testing on vitek® ms with v3.2 knowledge base was also performed.Isolate 911615 (715526330): for five (5) of the six (6) cards tested, a good id (90%) of c.Haemulonii was obtained.On the remaining card, a low discrimination call of c.Haemulonii/c.Duobushaemulonii was obtained.Vitek ms gave an identification of c.Auris, with a 99.9% confidence value.Isolate 911616 (713793230): on all six (6) cards, a very good or acceptable id of c.Haemulonii was obtained.Vitek ms gave an identification of c.Auris, with a 99.9% confidence value.A comparison of card reaction results for c.Haemulonii against expected reaction results for c.Auris showed three (3) atypical positive reactions (glyla, irhaa, xlta) and two (2) atypical negative reactions (tyra, dmlza) that led to the incorrect call.A comparison of customer card reaction results for the low discrimination results against expected reaction results for c.Auris showed three (3) atypical positive reactions (glyla, irhaa, xlta) and two (2) atypical negative reactions (dgala, dmlza) that led to the incorrect call.An increased number of atypical reactions can indicate contamination, mixed culture, use of non-recommended media, user set up error, or an atypical strain.This issue was determined to involve atypical strains.
|