• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL LATARJET, GLENOID DRILL; CANNULATED SURGICAL DRILL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL LATARJET, GLENOID DRILL; CANNULATED SURGICAL DRILL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 288241
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 03/07/2018
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported via phone by the sales rep that during a shoulder procedure, the customer's latarjet drill bit snapped off in the patient.The doctor removed the fragment with a grasper and used another drill bit to complete the procedure.There were no patient consequences, and the delay was less than 5 minutes.The device is being returned.The sales rep requested the older latarjet drill bit be sent to the customer.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual inspection under magnification reveals no anomalies on the device.The weld between the drill tip and drill shaft broke leading to this failure.This complaint can be confirmed.A dhr review has been conducted and the results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed one other similar complaint for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.Based on the complaint history and lot review, this failure seems to be an anomaly.A likely cause may have been exerting excess force or accidentally hitting bone during procedure.Other than this possibility, a root cause cannot be determined.At this point, no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LATARJET, GLENOID DRILL
Common Device Name
CANNULATED SURGICAL DRILL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
MDR Report Key7390197
Report Number1221934-2018-50356
Device Sequence Number196104
Product Code HTW
UDI-Device Identifier10886705027316
UDI-Public10886705027316
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,health
Initial Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/10/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number288241
Device Lot Number17C01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/10/2018
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/07/2018
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/10/2018
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/02/2018
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/07/2018
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-