| Catalog Number |
Z333H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
03/18/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The device history records were reviewed and the manufacturing criteria was met prior to the release of this lot.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported suture was used during a veterinarian procedure.The needle broke approximately 2 mm above the swage.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product upon which this medwatch is based has been received, however, the product evaluation is not yet complete.Any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 05/08/2018 device evaluation summary: representative samples were returned for evaluation.The sample was opened and the swage and attachment area were as expected; also, the tip and body of the needle no defects or needle breakage was observed.They were visually and functionally examined for resistance needle strength and they met the requirements.Per the condition of the representative samples, no performance ¿ breakage needle were found on the samples and the tested sample met the requirements.The actual device was returned for evaluation.A fracture was observed at the suture attachment of the needle.The needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surfaces was microscopically examined for this evaluation.The evaluation revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile overload failure.A cup-and-cone shaped fracture and macroscopic plastic deformation observed coincidental to the fracture provide additional evidence that the failure was induced by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload.This was a ductile fracture.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred at the attachment area of the needle during use due to tensile overload.There is no evidence of any material flaw or defect that would cause premature failure.In order to avoid this kind of damage grasp the needle in an area one-third (1/3) to one-half (1/2) of the distance from the attachment end to the point.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|