| Model Number |
ISERT 230 (+22.00D) |
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
03/22/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation is pending product return to manufacturer.After device evaluation is completed, manufacturer will submit a follow-up report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2018, distributor ((b)(4)) notified manufacturer that: "it was reported that the lens has malfunctioned upon insertion, the lens tore.No other information available." "the date of event is 'unknown' and based on the available information the event has been assessed by (b)(4) as 'not reportable'." on (b)(6) 2018, distributor ((b)(4)) notified manufacturer of updated information, as follows: "updated 04/05/2018: it was reported that a lens tear along the optic edge during insertion.Using an injector through the superior temporal incision, as the posterior chamber iol was being inserted, it was noted to have a tear along the optic edge extending from the leading haptic insertion.As the implant was infolding, the wound was increased to 5 mm; the optic was elevated out of the capsular bag into the anterior chamber then completely removed in 2 pieces.A second same lens was inserted with the haptic being placed directly in the capsular bag.The optic noted to center well with the haptic left at the 6 and 12 positions and sutures were used as part of the standard procedure.An inferior subconjunctival injection of gentamicin it was given under direct visualization.The patient tolerated the procedure well and left the or in stable condition." the date of event is: "(b)(6) 2018" and based on the new information the event has been assessed by (b)(4) as "reportable".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Follow-up report #2 is being submitted to fda for the follow reason: 1.Additional information not included in initial report, or follow-up report #1, labeled for single use? yes.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Follow-up report #1 is being submitted to fda for the following reasons: 1.Corrected information: device evaluated by mfr: changed to "not returned to manufacturer".2.Additional information not available/included in initial report: manufacturer's codes: added manufacturer's codes for: patient; device; method; results; and, conclusion.3.Additional information no available/included in initial report: risk analysis conducted on the product line and failure code, as noted below: a review of the most recent complaint trending data indicates no significant trends have been identified at this time, and no capa is required as part of product evaluation.This event can now be considered closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|