| Model Number |
286705320 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body Reaction (1868)
|
| Date of Event |
03/22/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device is available for evaluation.Investigation will be conducted.Follow up will be filed with the investigation results.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Surgeon did the sai screw via guide wire.Surgeon have difficulty to remove the guidewire after screw insertion.While surgeon try to remove it, the guidewire was broken inside patient.(customer has concern about the bio-compatibility of the broken piece of guidewire inside patient.Please provide information asap.) patient consequence? unknown.Patient consequence description:broken piece of guidewire (around 4 mm) left inside patient.Is the information being submitted for this complaint all the details that are known/available regarding this event? yes.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: corrected.Visual examination at the macroscopic level revealed that the fracture was located at the guidewire¿s distal tip.The second half of the tip was not returned for analysis.Device was then sent for fracture analysis.The fracture analysis report reveals plastic deformation and torsional shear markings following a circular pattern.This suggests that the fractured tip underwent a quasi-static overload torsional shear failure.A review of the device history record was conducted.No issues were identified during the manufacturing and release of this product that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.All complaint trends will be evaluated as a part of the depuy spine monthly complaint review meeting.A definitive root cause for the guidewire tip becoming fractured cannot be positively determined.However, the fracture analysis report suggests that the fractured tip underwent a quasi-static overload torsional shear failure.As there has been no issue identified in the manufacturing or release of the device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer and no systemic trends were found, this complaint file will be closed with no further action required.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|