Catalog Number M0031681910 |
Device Problem
Hole In Material (1293)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 03/21/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during procedure, while a guidewire (non-stryker) device was advance in the microcatheter (subject device), the guidewire was coming out of the microcatheter wall and not out of the tip of the microcatheter.The guidewire was not in the distal lumen anymore but next to the distal tip marker.The microcatheter was uneventfully removed from the patient and there was no consequences to the patient.It was not possible to reproduce the reported issue outside of the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device history record review confirms that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.Visual examination of the returned device revealed that the device was kinked/bent at approx.5cm from the distal end.During functional testing, the device was flushed with saline and no leaks were noted along the catheter shaft.The device was flushed under pressure and no leak was noted.This was confirmed by another team member.A 0.0158¿ patency mandrel was advanced through the catheter with resistance noted while passing through the distal end of the catheter due to the kinked/bent distal catheter shaft.The catheter kink and the friction were likely due to procedural factors limiting the performance of the device during the clinical procedure.The reported catheter shaft hole/perforation was not confirmed based on the observed device analysis.The manufacturer has reviewed all information and determined this event no longer meets the requirement of the reportable event for the subject device.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during procedure, while a guidewire (non-stryker) device was advance in the microcatheter (subject device), the guidewire was coming out of the microcatheter wall and not out of the tip of the microcatheter.The guidewire was not in the distal lumen anymore but next to the distal tip marker.The microcatheter was uneventfully removed from the patient and there was no consequences to the patient.It was not possible to reproduce the reported issue outside of the patient.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|