|
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.Expiration date: unknown.Unknown when non-union began.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(4) used for: hardware removal of a hind-foot nail took place on (b)(6) 2018 due to nonunion of subtalar joint.Investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device history records review not available for reporting at this time.Based on the information available, this complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Part: 04.013.044; lot: 7833861; date of manufacture: october 29, 2014; place of manufacture: (b)(4); nonconformance (ncr) noted: ncr (b)(4).Description of device history record (dhr) review: a review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot of ti spiral blade 60mm for ti retrograde femoral nails ¿ ex nonsterile product was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework nor non-conformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A review of the raw material device history record revealed this lot met all specifications but there was a non-conformance noted, ncr (b)(4).This ncr was for documentation; the original vendor supplied certified test report had the calculated beta transus temperature listed in degrees fahrenheit.This was corrected to degrees celsius and the lot of material was accepted.This raw material lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of manufacture with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|