• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 NEUROVASCULAR PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 NEUROVASCULAR PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/23/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Dodier, p., frischer, j.M., wang, w., auzinger, t., mallouhi, a., serles, w.,.Bavinzski, g.(2018).Immediate flow disruption as a prognostic factor after flow diverter treatment: long-term experience with the pipeline embolization device.World neurosurgery.Doi:10.1016/j.Wneu.2018.02.096 the pipeline devices have not been returned for evaluation; product analysis cannot be performed.The devices have not been returned; the reported events could not be confirmed.The causes of the event scould not be conclusively determined from the reported information.Mdrs related to this article: 2029214-2018-00320 2029214-2018-00321 2029214-2018-00322 2029214-2018-00323.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic literature review found reports of technical difficulties during pipeline placement.The purpose of this article was to report the long-term results after pipeline embolization device (ped) implantation.The authors retrospectively reviewed 40 patients with 59 aneurysms who underwent placement of 54 peds.The patients' mean age was 52.3 years; 34 of the patients were female.Balloon-dilatation of the ped was deemed necessary in 11 cases.The article states that balloon-dilatation was used during cases in which ped wall apposition was not achieved, in cases of tortuous internal carotid artery (ica) anatomy, or for suboptimal ped expansion.The article also states that the following deployment issues occurred: - immediate stent migration in two cases - delayed stent migration in one case - failed ped detachment in one case leading to abortion of the procedure.The patient did not experienced any neurological complication due to the aborted procedure.The article did not indicate that any patient adverse events occurred in association with these events.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 NEUROVASCULAR
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 NEUROVASCULAR
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
tricha miles
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
9496801224
MDR Report Key7449970
MDR Text Key106263221
Report Number2029214-2018-00320
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAU
PMA/PMN Number
P100018.S004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/22/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/23/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/26/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-