| Model Number |
G07600 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
04/10/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a venography, approximately 2 centimeters (cm) of the 10 (b)(4) performer introducer broke off and was retained in the patient.The piece was not found.Access was gained via the left groin using an ipsalateral approach.There was no problem with insertion, no calcification or tortuosity; however, the veins were narrowed and compressed.The 10fr performer introducer was removed and the incision was enlarged to accommodate a larger 16fr performer introducer which was inserted to deploy a "z stent." the physician denies accidentally cutting the 10fr introducer.After completion of the stent deployment, the 16fr performer introducer was removed.The 10fr performer introducer was re-inserted in order to finish the procedure.It was at that time the introducer was noted to be broken.Overall, it was reported that the venoplasty and stent deployment was successfully completed.According to the initial reporter, there are no plans to attempt to remove the foreign body.No additional adverse effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.Refer to for investigational findings.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation evaluation: a review of the dimensional verification, complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), quality control, and a visual inspection of the returned device were conducted during the investigation.A photographic inspection of a returned photograph was also performed.The visual inspection of the returned device confirmed that 5cm of tubing likely separated.Additionally, a photograph of the device which was also returned pictured a device which was similar in appearance to the one which was returned for the physical evaluation.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record showed no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.It should be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, the examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|