|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned, at this time, to the manufacturer for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) of reby0147 showed one other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.The complaints for this lot number (reby0147) have been reported from the same canda facility.Device has not yet been returned for evaluation.
|
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a catheter kink, which contributed towards an occlusion, was confirmed and was determined to be use related.The product returned for evaluation was a 4fr s/l powerpicc solo catheter.The sample contained blood and usage residue throughout and two permanent kink impressions were seen in the catheter shaft: one between the 10cm -11cm, and one between the 17cm-18cm depth markings.The catheter tubing was microscopically examined in, and around, the kink regions and no potential tubing defect or deficiency was observed.A segment of catheter tubing was taken near the 13cm depth marking and measured for dimensional conformity.The inside and outside diameters were measured to be within specification.The kink impressions appeared to have occurred during use and can be mitigated by placing the catheter in regions which are not prone to kinking.A lot history review (lhr) of reby0147 showed one other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.The complaints for this lot number (reby0147) have been reported from the same (b)(6) facility.
|