The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a kinked catheter was confirmed; however, the root cause was not identified.The product returned for evaluation was one photograph which appeared to depict a portion of powerglide midline catheter.The depicted catheter exhibited curved shape memory and a sharp kink near the distal end.Possible use residue appeared to be present within the catheter.Catheter damage was evident in the depicted device; however, inspection of the supplied photograph was insufficient to identify the root cause of the damage.Consequently this complaint is confirmed as ¿cause unknown¿ at this time.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|
It was reported that the midline has had ¿problems ¿since the time of placement.It had to be repositioned by the staff members and eventually removed.After removal it was found that the catheter was kinked, and that the tip of the catheter seemed to have been altered, appearing ¿v-shaped.¿ there was no reported patient injury.
|