|
The reason for this revision surgery was due to the poly being worn.The actual length of in-vivo for the item listed is unknown as the original surgery date was not provided or could be established.There is no information in this complaint about any patient injuries, activities, or accidents that may have contributed to the need for this revision surgery.There are no reported pre-existing patient health conditions.The healthcare professional indicated there was a delay in surgery, but no time was noted and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) was not conducted since the item and or lot number was not provided or determined during the complaint evaluation.Given the limited information, extensive search for an invoice of the previous surgery produced no results.Should additional information become available this investigation will be re-opened for further evaluation.The surgeon performed this procedure to remedy the patient's condition.This complaint will be closed with the item/lot number unknown pending receipt of additional information.No further action is deemed necessary.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery because the poly was worn.Inventory containment is not required since there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
|