• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THORATEC CORPORATION HEARTMATE 3 LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THORATEC CORPORATION HEARTMATE 3 LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 106524
Device Problem Partial Blockage (1065)
Patient Problems Hemolysis (1886); Right Ventricular Failure (2055)
Event Date 04/05/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The heartmate 3 lvas was implanted during the momentum 3 clinical trial, ide# (b)(4).Fda approval for heartmate 3 lvas was received on 23 august 2017.The same device is used commercially and in the ongoing momentum 3 trial.The gtin unique device identifier for the commercial heartmate3 lvas is (b)(4).Approximate age of device ¿ 7 months.No further information was provided.A supplemental report will be submitted when the manufacturer¿s investigation is completed.
 
Event Description
The patient was implanted with a left ventricular assist device (lvad) on (b)(6) 2017.It was reported that the lvad system produced low flow alarms.The patient experienced shortness of breath secondary to anxiety, and was admitted.The following morning the patient was stable.Echocardiogram (echo) did not reveal any device issues, but did reveal right heart dysfunction, and the lvad speed was increased.There was no distinguishable change in left ventricular size with speed changes.Dobutamine and nipride were started.Ct scan with direct contrast revealed little flow coming from the pump.There was concern for outflow graft obstruction, and the patient¿s lactate dehydrogenase (ldh) was 400 u/l.On (b)(6) 2018 ct scan with contrast revealed an obstructed outflow graft.On (b)(6) 2018 it was reported that the patient was still admitted and stable on inotropes.The patient had multiple angiograms to evaluate flow through the pump, all of which were consistent with limited to no flow.The patient was being supported with inotropes and had a pa catheter for hemodynamic monitoring.There were no plans for outflow graft revision unless the patient became unstable.The patient was evaluated for transplant.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was initially reported that the device was not available for evaluation.The patient subsequently received a heart transplant and the pump was returned for investigation.The evaluation is not yet complete.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2018 it was reported that the patient was still inpatient and stable on inotropes.Review of the submitted log file by technical services revealed lvad flow trending downward over time.The lvad speed was changed between 7600 rpm ¿ 9000 rpm.The low flow alarms were reportedly increasing in frequency.On (b)(6) 2018 the patient underwent heart transplant after being upgraded on the transplant list from 1b to 1ab due to outflow graft twisting.The patient¿s heart was explanted with heartmate 3 attached to the left ventricle.The surgeon cut into the bend relief exposing the outflow graft with a visible twist just superior to the blue screw ring.It was reported that the blue screw ring was loose and able to be rotated left and right with slight effort.On (b)(6) 2018, it was reported that the patient was so far stable after transplant.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HEARTMATE 3 LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM
Type of Device
LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
THORATEC CORPORATION
6035 stoneridge drive
pleasanton CA 94588
MDR Report Key7477297
MDR Text Key107030864
Report Number2916596-2018-01596
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/13/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date05/31/2020
Device Catalogue Number106524
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/29/2018
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/05/2018
Initial Date FDA Received05/01/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/18/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/13/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age44 YR
Patient Weight104
-
-