• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-JUG-CELECT-PERM
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Material Twisted/Bent (2981); Insufficient Information (3190); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204); Abdominal Pain (1685); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Anxiety (2328); No Information (3190)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Catalog# is unknown but referred to as cook celect filter.(b)(4).It has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
 
Event Description
Description of event according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a celect filter on (b)(6) 2013".Patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The following allegations have been investigated.Embedded, anxiety, stress and abdominal pain.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Unknown if the reported anxiety, stress & abdominal pain is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2013 via the right internal jugular vein due to post pulmonary embolism (pe).Patient is alleging device tilt, vena cava perforation and embedment.Patient notes and further alleges experiencing "anxiety, stress, abdominal pain".Per the (b)(6) 2013 retrievable inferior vena cava filter placement: "then, the celect vena cava filter was introduced and successfully deployed in the infrarenal vena cava.Post filter deployment venogram shows a filter has a satisfactory position and configuration".
 
Event Description
Per a computed tomography (ct) scan of the abdomen without contrast dated (b)(6) 2019: "impression: ivc filter in place with apex below the lowest renal vein.Tilted ivc filter with apex adjacent to posterior wall.Struts perforate the wall.An anterior strut is adjacent to the posterior wall of the third portion of duodenum".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(device code): appropriate term/code not available (3191) for device perforation.(device code): appropriate term/code not available (3191) for device tilt.Investigation - investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: vc perforation, tilt, and bent strut.Vena cava wall penetration/perforation has been reported and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.Unknown if the reported bent strut is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COOK CELECT JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
DA  4632
MDR Report Key7478821
MDR Text Key107068636
Report Number3002808486-2018-00501
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K073374
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/18/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/02/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/15/2015
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-JUG-CELECT-PERM
Device Lot NumberE3055480
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date04/17/2018
Date Manufacturer Received10/25/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Weight116
-
-