| Model Number |
NONE |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Use of Device Problem (1670)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Bowel Perforation (2668)
|
| Date of Event |
03/06/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Review of available imaging suggested that rectal perforation was most likely caused by the transrectal ultrasound (trus) probe ((b)(4) model #8848).Perforation was not caused by the waterjet or the transurethral aquabeam handpiece.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A man underwent aquablation for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.Patient had history of rectal polyps and diverticulitis.Two days after an uneventful aquablation procedure he developed abdominal pain with peritoneal signs.Abdominal ct showed free air in the abdomen.He underwent laparotomy during which a 1 cm rectal perforation in the anterior rectum 2 cm beyond the prostate was observed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Subsequent investigation into this event concluded that the rectal perforation was likely caused by the physician exerting excessive upward pressure of the trus probe on the anterior rectum.This was confirmed by ultrasound images that showed the prostate being wrapped around the probe.The posterior-most aspect of the prostate could not be seen, consistent with excessive force being applied.The aquabeam system's instructions for use (ifu), ifu320301, rev.D, lists rectal perforation as a potential perioperative risk of the aquablation procedure.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|