|
Method: visual inspection, material analysis, device history review, complaint history review, risk assessment.Result: the reported event was confirmed via visual inspection.The rod was confirmed to be fractured into 2 pieces.The device was sent for material analysis.The rod was found to have fractured in fatigue at a contact point with the polyaxial screw.The elemental constituent was consistent with the material listed on the print.No material or manufacturing defects were found.Conclusion: the device was implanted for almost 5 years, the most likely root cause is fatigue fracture of the rod due to length of implantation due to non fusion.The surgical technique states that " while the expected life of spinal implant components is difficult to estimate, it is finite.These components are made of foreign materials which are placed within the body for the potential fusion of the spine and reduction of pain.However, due to the many biological, mechanical and physicochemical factors which affect these devices but cannot be evaluated in vivo, the components cannot be expected to indefinitely withstand the activity level and loads of normal healthy bone.Fatigue fracture of spinal fixation devices, including screws and rods, has occurred.Internal fixation appliances are load sharing devices which are used to obtain alignment until normal healing occurs.In the event that healing is delayed, does not occur, or failure to immobilize the delayed/nonunion results, the implant will be subject to excessive and repeated stresses which can eventually cause loosening, bending or fatigue fracture.The degree or success of union, loads produced by weight bearing, and activity levels will, among other conditions, dictate the longevity of the implant.".
|